<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quote a Day &#187; Jeff Einstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quotes.gophercentral.com/tag/jeff-einstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Back Up the Rabbit Hole</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2010/03/10/back-up-the-rabbit-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2010/03/10/back-up-the-rabbit-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back Up the Rabbit Hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back Up the Rabbit Hole: an Interview with Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Back Up the Rabbit Hole: an Interview with Jeff Einstein 
Pete – Welcome, Jeff. What evidence can you cite to support
your assertion that we&#8217;ve passed through the looking glass
and plunged down the rabbit hole? 
Jeff – We can begin with a litany of online performance
indicators, including the prevalence of sub-$1 CPMs, click-
through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wednesday, March 10, 2010</p>
<p>Back Up the Rabbit Hole: an Interview with Jeff Einstein </p>
<p>Pete – Welcome, Jeff. What evidence can you cite to support<br />
your assertion that we&#8217;ve passed through the looking glass<br />
and plunged down the rabbit hole? </p>
<p>Jeff – We can begin with a litany of online performance<br />
indicators, including the prevalence of sub-$1 CPMs, click-<br />
through rates firmly ensconced at statistical zero, click<br />
fraud estimates of anywhere from 25-85% (depending on your<br />
choice of networks and industry experts), not to mention<br />
the insolvency and failure of thousands of media franchises,<br />
many of them brand names with long, distinguished track<br />
records. In more sober environments with more sober leader-<br />
ship such massive failure and systemic collapse might give<br />
us pause, but as an industry we&#8217;ve responded instead by<br />
speeding up, doubli ng down and plunging ourselves even<br />
deeper down the rabbit hole in Lewis Carroll&#8217;s vision of<br />
madness, a world where up is down and down is up. If any-<br />
thing, we&#8217;ve accelerated our commitments to the very same<br />
insanity that got us here in the first place. </p>
<p>Pete – That&#8217;s pretty harsh. Aren&#8217;t many of our problems<br />
right now simple byproducts of a deep recession? </p>
<p>Jeff – No, I don&#8217;t think so. While the recession certainly<br />
hurts like crazy, our problems don&#8217;t result from the<br />
recession as much as the recession results from our<br />
problems. Performance across all channels has actually<br />
been in decline for a couple of decades now, regardless<br />
of the economy and in spite of explosive industry growth. </p>
<p>Pete – Then why do you think media performance is so anemic<br />
these days? </p>
<p>Jeff – Mostly because media performance is a myth to begin<br />
with. We&#8217;re chasing a great white whale. Media aren&#8217;t<br />
supposed to perform. The message should perform, not the<br />
media. The onus to perform should weigh on the advertisers<br />
and the agencies, not on the publishers and content<br />
providers; their only job is to aggregate and somehow<br />
entertain or inform an audience, the same now as it was<br />
fifty years ago. </p>
<p>Only with the digitally-driven ascent of discrete media<br />
agencies as the crown jewels of global media holding<br />
companies did we suddenly discover an excuse to divorce<br />
the medium from the message and shift the onus of<br />
performance from the message to the medium in the process.<br />
But in truth, the media simply can&#8217;t perform because they<br />
were never designed to. And that&#8217;s why, despite all the lip<br />
service, advertisers and agencies don&#8217;t buy performance.<br />
They buy ubiquity, the exact opposite. Rather than assume<br />
responsibility for their own lack of performance,<br />
advertisers and agencies would rather hedge their bets and<br />
buy more and more of something that&#8217;s worth less and less<br />
with each passing day. Big advertisers and big agencies<br />
talk performance, but they buy ubiquity because they know<br />
the media can&#8217;t perform. </p>
<p>Pete – Lots of industry folks are calling for a complete<br />
online marketing overhaul, including new metrics, more<br />
sophisticated targeting technologies, more research, more<br />
data-based marketing, and more social media. What do you<br />
think? </p>
<p>Jeff – I think new metrics are just another way to shoot<br />
the messenger, another way to rearrange the deck chairs on<br />
a sinking ship. Besides, in marketing applications metrics<br />
never really describe what works as much as they describe<br />
what can be sold. We already know that the continued growth<br />
of online ad budgets will rely increasingly on our ability<br />
to sell more branding, in no small part because we&#8217;ve<br />
invested so heavily in ad serving technologies and infra-<br />
structure over the past 15 years. The perceived need to<br />
sell more branding explains why the new metrics being<br />
proposed now all seek to measure the very things the<br />
industry arrogantly dismissed as useless and effete back<br />
in the mid-1990s, all the intangibles that drove the<br />
growth of great branding media like print, radio and TV<br />
for decades. We cut off our noses to spite our faces 15<br />
years ago in a foolish and immature effort to distinguish<br />
digital media from their analog counterparts, and now the<br />
bed we&#8217;ve made for ourselves is wrecking everyone&#8217;s sleep,<br />
our own not least. Each new metric just adds another rifle<br />
to the circular firing squad. </p>
<p>Pete – What about behavioral targeting?</p>
<p>Jeff – Anyone with any historical perspective will right-<br />
fully conclude that each additional layer of targeting<br />
technology increases costs and reduces performance. As<br />
a result, each additional layer of targeting technology<br />
further burdens publishers and networks alike. The promise<br />
of digital scale starts working against them; the more<br />
traffic they attract and the more advertising they sell,<br />
the faster they go out of business. McLuhan had it right:<br />
any medium pushed to extreme will begin to operate in<br />
reverse. </p>
<p>Sophisticated targeting technologies don&#8217;t work because<br />
commercial media are now and always have been on-demand,<br />
and in an on-demand media universe it simply makes far<br />
less sense to target the audience and far more sense to<br />
let the audience target us instead, exactly why search<br />
works so much better than display advertising, and exactly<br />
– despite industry claims to the contrary &#8212; why neither<br />
search nor targeted display advertising is scalable at the<br />
end of the day. This much we know with absolute certainty:<br />
no one demands more advertising, relevant or otherwise,<br />
and everyone is equipped to avoid it. That&#8217;s the primary<br />
reason why online advertising fails at least 99.9 percent<br />
of the time, and why TV and radio executives are having<br />
nervous breakdowns. </p>
<p>Pete – Should I assume from your aversion to behavioral<br />
targeting that you&#8217;re also no fan of data-based marketing? </p>
<p>Read the full interview here&#8230;<br />
<a href=" http://thecmoclub.blogspot.com/2010/03/back-up-rabbit-hole-interview-with-jeff.html ">Back Up the Rabbit Hole: an Interview with Jeff Einstein</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Questions? Comments? Email me at: quote (at) Quotes2u.com<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Follow Your Favorite GopherCentral Publications on Twitter:<br />
<a href=" http://www.gophertweets.com/ ">http://www.gophertweets.com/</a> More Coming Soon! </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
End of MEDIA PERSPECTIVES<br />
Copyright 2010 by NextEra Media All rights reserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2010/03/10/back-up-the-rabbit-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Expectation</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/11/11/great-expectation/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/11/11/great-expectation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Expectations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walking the Talk: Great Expectations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walking the Talk: Great Expectations
by: Jeff Einstein
I remember driving some years ago along the Olympic
Peninsula south of Seattle in the Pacific Northwest on a
cold and rainy winter day. I had expected to find solace
in miles and miles of verdant old growth rain forest,
but instead encountered acre after acre of clear-cut
desolation, replete with Orwellian signage that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walking the Talk: Great Expectations<br />
by: Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>I remember driving some years ago along the Olympic<br />
Peninsula south of Seattle in the Pacific Northwest on a<br />
cold and rainy winter day. I had expected to find solace<br />
in miles and miles of verdant old growth rain forest,<br />
but instead encountered acre after acre of clear-cut<br />
desolation, replete with Orwellian signage that euphemized<br />
the devastation as managed forests. </p>
<p>Fade out, fade in: Nowadays when I hear agencies talk about<br />
managed expectations, I can&#8217;t help but think of the media<br />
landscape as a gigantic managed forest, clear-cut and<br />
desolate. Nowadays it seems that the phrase managed expect-<br />
ations is little more than a euphemism for lowered expect-<br />
ations. </p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;m beginning to suspect that we don&#8217;t truly<br />
manage our expectations as much as they manage us. In the<br />
Brothers Einstein, my little boutique agency, my brother<br />
Mike and I predicate our work and relationships partly on<br />
what we call the Albert Keeler Principle, an amalgam<br />
borrowed from the sage counsel of two 20th-century American<br />
giants, Albert Einstein, and Hall of Fame baseball great,<br />
Wee Willie Keeler. </p>
<p>According to Albert Einstein&#8230;</p>
<p>No problem can be solved from the same level of conscious-<br />
ness that created it. </p>
<p>And according to Mr. Keeler, we should&#8230; </p>
<p>Hit &#8216;em where they ain&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Notably, Messrs. Einstein and Keeler made it a point to<br />
approach their respective disciplines as perpetual out-<br />
siders. They eschewed convention and looked for the<br />
anomalies, for the exceptions, not the rules. They looked<br />
for the mistakes of others, pounced on them and in between<br />
them, and ascended to greatness. Indeed, they ascended to<br />
greatness in no small measure because they expected great-<br />
ness, from themselves not least. </p>
<p>In his wonderful essay, Self-Reliance, Ralph Waldo Emerson<br />
wrote that &#8220;&#8230;a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of<br />
little minds.&#8221; But a foolish consistency breeds more than<br />
little minds. Fealty to convention and consistency promotes<br />
scale and quantity at the expense of intimacy and quality,<br />
converts relationships into commodities, and breeds lower<br />
expectations. And nothing breeds little minds like lowered<br />
expectations. </p>
<p>If we want less we need only expect less. Case in point:<br />
George W. Bush. No one expected greatness from him, and<br />
look what happened. Likewise, no one expects anyone in<br />
Congress to do anything except pander and raise money<br />
for re-election, so that&#8217;s pretty much all they do.<br />
Performance, it seems, rises and falls with our expect-<br />
ations. If we want more, we need to raise our expect-<br />
ations. If we want more from the Obama administration,<br />
we need to raise our expectations accordingly. Cultural<br />
greatness emerges only from cultures of great expectations.</p>
<p>The same expectation-to-performance ratio exists across<br />
the board in all of our relationships. The more we expect<br />
of ourselves, the more we can expect from others in return.<br />
My brother Mike and I learned some years ago not to manage<br />
to our bottom line. We learned instead to manage to our<br />
expectations, which — like our fees — only go up as a<br />
result. Conversely, managing to the bottom line will almost<br />
always reduce performance and breed little minds. Managing<br />
to the bottom line will almost always lower our expect-<br />
ations. </p>
<p>We have become so inured to failure as a consequence and<br />
companion of digital scale that we have all but stopped<br />
asking for more. Yet A Course in Miracles suggests that<br />
the problem is not that we ask for too much, rather that<br />
we don&#8217;t ask for nearly enough. The same is true of our<br />
expectations. We fear raising them because we fear the<br />
ensuing disappointment. But we demonstrate a natural<br />
tendency to become our attention over time, and the more<br />
we focus on diminished expectations because we fear<br />
failure, the more failure we guarantee. In the end, our<br />
expectations — like our fears — manage us. </p>
<p>We cannot continue to expect our digital communications<br />
technologies to compensate for relationships that simply<br />
don&#8217;t exist, because business describes much more than<br />
commerce. Business describes relationships, and the<br />
relationships in our lives describe how and where and<br />
with whom we spend our time. Our relationships shape our<br />
expectations, which then return to shape our relation-<br />
ships. In recent years, however, our relationships with<br />
others have been truncated by the sheer time and resources<br />
we devote to our relationships with digital media<br />
technologies. The quality of our relationships and the<br />
level of our expectations suffer commensurately. It&#8217;s<br />
time for agencies and advertisers to get real with them-<br />
selves and walk their respective relationship talk. </p>
<p>The only real antidote to diminished expectations in the<br />
digital age is to exchange the emotional desolation of<br />
scale for the intimacy of human contact, one voice or one<br />
face at a time. Don&#8217;t look for quick and easy ways to<br />
expand your contact database; search instead for ways to<br />
eliminate shallow, technology-driven relationships and the<br />
massive overhead they incur. Accordingly, don&#8217;t manage<br />
your relationships by email. Don&#8217;t manage them by text<br />
message or tweet. Schedule some time to break bread with<br />
your clients (or agency). Pick up the fucking phone before<br />
you forget how to use it, before you forget the power of<br />
your own voice, and before there is nothing left to manage<br />
but managed forests. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Questions? Comments? Email me at: quote (at) Quotes2u.com<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/11/11/great-expectation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scared Straight</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/09/02/scared-straight/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/09/02/scared-straight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral targeting salesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. Faust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scared Straight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scared Straight
By Jeff Einstein
The following is a transcript from a phone call between a
behavioral targeting salesman and a certain Mr. Faust, CEO
of Anything for a Buck Enterprises&#8230; 
Faust: Hello, and thanks for calling Anything for a Buck.
Faust speaking.
BT Salesman: Good morning, Mr. Faust. You don&#8217;t know me but
have I got a deal for you!
Faust: Great! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scared Straight<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>The following is a transcript from a phone call between a<br />
behavioral targeting salesman and a certain Mr. Faust, CEO<br />
of Anything for a Buck Enterprises&#8230; </p>
<p>Faust: Hello, and thanks for calling Anything for a Buck.<br />
Faust speaking.</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Good morning, Mr. Faust. You don&#8217;t know me but<br />
have I got a deal for you!</p>
<p>Faust: Great! I&#8217;m always interested in a good deal. Tell me<br />
about it.</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Well, Mr. Faust, I&#8217;ve got this spectacular new<br />
technology that will allow you to collect the most intimate<br />
details of your customers&#8217; online lives.</p>
<p>Faust: Sounds a little creepy. I like it.</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Exactly! You&#8217;ll know every move they make,<br />
every Web site they visit, how long they spend there, what<br />
they buy, what they do – everything!</p>
<p>Faust: Sounds downright diabolical. But what&#8217;s the point?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: You&#8217;ll be able to increase your online ad<br />
performance by up to 50%.</p>
<p>Faust: Well, hold on for a moment. Let me do the math: A<br />
50% lift of my usual point one percent CTR. Hmmm. That<br />
brings my performance all the way up to .15%. But even<br />
with the added lift I&#8217;m still at statistical zero. Sounds<br />
like much ado about nothing to me.</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Well, you know the CTR is just the tip of the<br />
iceberg. You&#8217;ll also be able to sell the data you collect!</p>
<p>Faust: Sell the data? To whom?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: To anyone who asks. You could even give it<br />
away to the government!</p>
<p>Faust: Won&#8217;t people who come to my Web site object to being<br />
tracked like escaped convicts and having their data sold to<br />
the highest bidder or given away to the government? </p>
<p>BT Salesman: Naaah. Not to worry. Most folks won&#8217;t even<br />
know. </p>
<p>Faust: What about those who do?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: We&#8217;ll solicit their informed consent.</p>
<p>Faust: Informed consent? What idiot would agree to some-<br />
thing like that?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Anyone who wants relevant ads.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>================ YOUR VIDEO SNACK BAR&#8230; ==================<br />
                            Top Videos Of The Week</p>
<p>       1. Funniest Moments In Comedy<br />
       http://c.gophercentral.com/BqmZ</p>
<p>       2. Annette Funicello &#8211; Surfin<br />
       http://c.gophercentral.com/2cUP </p>
<p>       3. Learn Yoga<br />
       http://c.gophercentral.com/qdjL </p>
<p>       4. Beyonce &#8211; At Last<br />
       http://c.gophercentral.com/lqgw</p>
<p>       5. Classic Johnny Carson<br />
       http://c.gophercentral.com/JngY</p>
<p>       6. Amazing Nature Stills<br />
       http://c.gophercentral.com/LApX</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Faust: Relevant ads? Who the hell wants any ads?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Studies conclude that consumers prefer<br />
relevant ads to non-relevant ads.</p>
<p>Faust: Studies, eh? So where&#8217;s the informed consent part?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: We&#8217;ll provide you with a simple boilerplate<br />
privacy statement and consent form.</p>
<p>Faust: Now you&#8217;re talking. How long is the consent form?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Well, the standard privacy statement and form<br />
is eight pages, but you can add to it if you want.</p>
<p>Faust: Eight pages? Who the hell&#8217;s gonna read eight pages?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: No one I know. But they don&#8217;t have to read it<br />
to accept it.</p>
<p>Faust: You mean people will consent to something they never<br />
read?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Of course. You think any laws would get passed<br />
by Congress if they actually had to read what they sign?</p>
<p>Faust: Good point. But that&#8217;s hardly informed consent.<br />
Seems more like uninformed consent.</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Informed, uninformed. Let&#8217;s not split hairs,<br />
Mr. Faust. Whattaya say?</p>
<p>Faust: I don&#8217;t know. Sounds a little ethically challenged<br />
to me.</p>
<p>BT Salesman: Exactly! I knew you&#8217;d appreciate it! Can I<br />
write you up?</p>
<p>Faust: Well, much as the idea of spying on everyone who<br />
visits my Web site appeals to me, and much as the thought<br />
of selling the most intimate details of my customers&#8217; lives<br />
to the highest bidder&#8230; </p>
<p>BT Salesman: And don&#8217;t forget the government.</p>
<p>Faust: Right. Right. Right. And much as the corruptive<br />
union of corporate and state power entices me, I gotta<br />
say that I just don&#8217;t feel right about this one. Just<br />
seems way over the top and without any ethical or moral<br />
foundation whatsoever – even for me. </p>
<p>BT Salesman: Well, Mr. Faust, I appreciate your candor.<br />
Would it be okay if we keep your phone number and email<br />
address on file to keep you posted on future product<br />
updates? </p>
<p>Faust: I suppose. You need my email address?</p>
<p>BT Salesman: No thanks, Mr. Faust. We&#8217;ve already got it.<br />
(Click&#8230;bzzzzzzzz.)</p>
<p>Faust: Hello? </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with very select rapid-growth clients to<br />
help define and execute healthy brand strategies in a<br />
toxic media environment. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/09/02/scared-straight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask a Stupid Question</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/08/26/ask-a-stupid-question/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/08/26/ask-a-stupid-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask a Stupid Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask a Stupid Question: The Irrelevance of Relevance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBERSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Official Brothers Einstein Research Survey Clipboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Irrelevance of Relevance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask a Stupid Question: The Irrelevance of Relevance
By Jeff Einstein
You&#8217;ve heard it said a thousand times before: Ask a stupid
question, get a stupid answer. Seems like a simple and
unassailable hypothesis – at least for those with half a
brain. Suitably equipped and ever the contrarian, there-
fore, I set out the other day to challenge conventional
wisdom yet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask a Stupid Question: The Irrelevance of Relevance<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve heard it said a thousand times before: Ask a stupid<br />
question, get a stupid answer. Seems like a simple and<br />
unassailable hypothesis – at least for those with half a<br />
brain. Suitably equipped and ever the contrarian, there-<br />
fore, I set out the other day to challenge conventional<br />
wisdom yet again, this time armed with my OBERSC (Official<br />
Brothers Einstein Research Survey Clipboard) and not one<br />
but two appropriately stupid questions: </p>
<p>Question #1: Do you want more or fewer ads?</p>
<p>Question #2: How do you want your ads, relevant or<br />
irrelevant? </p>
<p>What amazes me in retrospect is not that those with clear<br />
vested interests in behavioral targeting technologies<br />
persist with silly claims that consumers actually want<br />
relevant ads, but that they a) can find enough unwitting<br />
pigeons willing to stand still long enough to answer such<br />
abysmally stupid and patently self-serving questions in<br />
the first place, and b) are willing to pay for the results. </p>
<p>My amazement is predicated in part on responses to my<br />
admittedly unscientific survey of 52 individuals, all of<br />
whom I queried recently either at the Queens Plaza Mall<br />
(32 respondents) or the Noguchi Museum (20 respondents),<br />
both in New York City. </p>
<p>In response to question #1, only 42% said they want fewer<br />
ads, good news for advertisers &#8212; at least at first blush.<br />
The other 58%, however, told me to get lost (or less civil<br />
words to that effect). Not a single respondent stated a<br />
preference for more ads (even among those who didn&#8217;t<br />
threaten me right away with bodily harm). Of course<br />
reaction to the first question all but eliminated any need<br />
to ask the second question; one blatantly stupid question<br />
seemed more than sufficient. </p>
<p>Upon meticulous and painstaking cross-tabulation of the<br />
resulting survey data, a number of possible extrapolations<br />
emerged: </p>
<p>1) You don&#8217;t always get a stupid response to a stupid<br />
question (those who refused to answer my stupid questions<br />
spoke volumes simply by walking &#8212; or running &#8212; away); </p>
<p>2) It&#8217;s critically important to incentivize (bribe) survey<br />
respondents (or at least seal off their escape) if you<br />
intend to ask more than one stupid question; and </p>
<p>3) The only way to justify stupid research is to ask the<br />
wrong stupid question first. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>================ YOUR VIDEO SNACK BAR&#8230; ==================<br />
                Top Videos Of The Week</p>
<p>1. Hendrix at Woodstock<br />
http://c.gophercentral.com/xXo9</p>
<p>2. Marine Silent Marching<br />
http://c.gophercentral.com/L6Ba</p>
<p>3. Brad Pitt &#8211; Mr. &#038; Mrs.Smith<br />
http://c.gophercentral.com/2YrM</p>
<p>4. Classic Blues Brothers<br />
http://c.gophercentral.com/7J1b</p>
<p>5. NFL Greats &#8211; Walter Payton<br />
http://c.gophercentral.com/wFU2</p>
<p>6. Classic Spike Jones<br />
http://c.gophercentral.com/iy4y</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>And so it is with behavioral targeting advocates who claim<br />
consumers actually want relevant ads: they prove their<br />
hypothesis by asking the wrong stupid question first.<br />
Still, it&#8217;s a brilliant and time-honored agency strategy<br />
designed to exploit the fears, uncertainties and doubts<br />
(the FUDs) of the only ones insipid and lazy enough to<br />
foot the bill for it all: the advertisers. Those of you<br />
who have any agency experience already know that no agency<br />
ever went broke by overestimating the intelligence of its<br />
own clients. You also likely know that virtually all<br />
performance metrics are devised by agencies as a means to<br />
bill for the research required to justify and defend the<br />
metrics, however specious. </p>
<p>Failed metrics that agencies can no longer defend and sell<br />
to their hapless clients (like CTRs that now hover at<br />
statistical zero) will be swapped ASAP for those that can<br />
&#8211; like black box metrics designed to promote and sell<br />
&#8220;relevancy.&#8221; Of course the new generation of metrics to<br />
support behavioral targeting technologies and the pursuit<br />
of relevancy will require truckloads of research and<br />
analysis to defend, not to mention tons of user data<br />
collected from thousands of disparate sources. Ironically,<br />
however, the relevancy of the message becomes entirely<br />
irrelevant the very moment data replaces media as the<br />
dominant commodity in the pipeline. Because who needs<br />
relevance if the real product being sold is data? </p>
<p>Of course advertisers who invest in behavioral targeting<br />
are perfectly free to waste their advertising and market-<br />
ing budgets any way they want. But their investments in<br />
behavioral targeting technologies come with a perfidious<br />
hidden tax, one no longer measured merely in standard<br />
currencies, because the currencies at risk this time<br />
aren&#8217;t just their money and their brand equity. The true<br />
currencies at risk this time are our privacy and our<br />
freedom. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with very select rapid-growth clients to<br />
help define and execute healthy brand strategies in a<br />
toxic media environment. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/08/26/ask-a-stupid-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Targeting Bad Behavior</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/07/22/targeting-bad-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/07/22/targeting-bad-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeting Bad Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeting Bad Behavior: The Truth Behind Behavioral Targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Targeting Bad Behavior: The Truth Behind Behavioral Target-
ing
By Jeff Einstein
Current behavioral targeting (BT) controversies among
consumer advocacy groups and government agencies focus
primarily on how these aggressive new technologies affect
consumer privacy (and there&#8217;s plenty of cause for concern
among privacy advocates and legislators alike). But I&#8217;d
like to focus this article instead on how behavioral
targeting affects advertisers &#8212; where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Targeting Bad Behavior: The Truth Behind Behavioral Target-<br />
ing<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>Current behavioral targeting (BT) controversies among<br />
consumer advocacy groups and government agencies focus<br />
primarily on how these aggressive new technologies affect<br />
consumer privacy (and there&#8217;s plenty of cause for concern<br />
among privacy advocates and legislators alike). But I&#8217;d<br />
like to focus this article instead on how behavioral<br />
targeting affects advertisers &#8212; where the proverbial<br />
buck to fund BT campaigns literally begins and ends. </p>
<p>So here&#8217;s my first BT question to advertisers and their<br />
agency proxies: What the hell are you thinking? Where<br />
do you find any evidence whatsoever to suggest that<br />
subsequent layers of targeting technology do anything<br />
except raise costs, drive down performance, and reinforce<br />
the one thing that we already know for certain about<br />
on-demand media: that no one demands more advertising? </p>
<p>Contrary to industry claims, behavioral targeting isn&#8217;t<br />
marketing at all; it&#8217;s virtual stalking, a predatory<br />
behavior that relies almost exclusively on stealth<br />
(because no one would tolerate the overt collection of<br />
sensitive behavioral data). How desperate are we that<br />
we feel the need to lurk in the shadows like digital<br />
stalkers and hunt our prey? Desperate enough apparently<br />
to risk association with a technology that&#8217;s already<br />
squarely aligned in the crosshairs of lawmakers,<br />
government agencies and consumer advocacy groups alike.<br />
The most relevant question for advertisers to ask them-<br />
selves about BT is not how to make it work, but what to<br />
do after it fails to work. Where do advertisers turn<br />
next? </p>
<p>Advocates of BT claim that consumers want relevant ads.<br />
But that&#8217;s patently false and self serving, not to<br />
mention utterly absurd (right up there on the Alice in<br />
Wonderland index with the myth of consumer demand). In<br />
fact, I would challenge any proponent of BT to identify<br />
even a single consumer advocacy group that embraces it,<br />
or even accepts the notion that consumers want ads at<br />
all, relevant or otherwise. No, this is clearly not at<br />
all about what consumers want. And it&#8217;s clearly not about<br />
what actually works – not when average clickthrough rates<br />
are 15-20 times lower than they were less than a decade<br />
ago, when the first BT technologies appeared. This is<br />
only about what BT providers and agencies can sell to<br />
advertisers, the guys who foot the bill. And advertisers<br />
who buy BT are buying a pregnant pig in a poke, a porcine<br />
technology loaded with more legal liabilities than<br />
thalidomide and tobacco combined. </p>
<p>The fact that so many marketing and advertising trade<br />
associations have suddenly rallied around BT to ward off<br />
potential government regulation of the digital marketing<br />
industry is not only a measure of our desperation, but a<br />
measure of our profound disconnect from reality. To think<br />
that we can justify such hyper-aggressive behavior as a<br />
means to initiate or sustain meaningful relationships<br />
stinks of Orwellian Newspeak. BT will make industry faux<br />
pas like spam and malware seem in comparison like choir<br />
boys, and in the end the only ones whose behavior will be<br />
targeted is our own &#8212; when we suddenly find ourselves<br />
subpoenaed to testify before Congress or a judge and jury.<br />
We are playing with fire. </p>
<p>Legal liabilities notwithstanding, what evidence out there<br />
suggests that BT works for advertisers (or for anyone<br />
except the agencies and BT technology providers)? What<br />
evidence can agencies and BT technology providers offer<br />
to justify the added commitment, expense and significant<br />
risks associated with their products and services?<br />
Advertisers, before you throw more good money after bad,<br />
ask yourselves how BT suddenly makes knowable what the<br />
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle – a mainstay of quantum<br />
physics theory &#8212; says we can&#8217;t know with any certainty.<br />
Financier George Soros discusses his variation on the<br />
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (what he called the Human<br />
Uncertainty Principle)in his book, &#8220;Alchemy of Finance&#8221;: </p>
<p>&#8220;People&#8217;s understanding of the world in which they live<br />
cannot correspond to the facts and be complete and coherent<br />
at the same time. Insofar as people&#8217;s thinking is confined<br />
to the facts, it is not sufficient to reach decisions; and<br />
insofar as it serves as the basis of decisions, it cannot<br />
be confined to the facts. The human uncertainty principle<br />
applies to both thinking and reality. It ensures that our<br />
understanding is often incoherent and always incomplete<br />
and introduces an element of genuine uncertainty &#8211; as<br />
distinct from randomness &#8211; into the course of events. &#8220;The<br />
human uncertainty principle bears a strong resemblance to<br />
Heisenberg&#8217;s uncertainty principle, which holds that the<br />
position and momentum of quantum particles cannot be<br />
measured at the same time. But there is an important<br />
difference. Heisenberg&#8217;s uncertainty principle does not<br />
influence the behavior of quantum particles one iota;<br />
they would behave the same way if the principle had never<br />
been discovered. The same is not true of the human<br />
uncertainty principle. Theories about human behavior can<br />
and do influence human behavior. Marxism had a tremendous<br />
impact on history, and market fundamentalism is having a<br />
similar influence today.&#8221; </p>
<p>The observer effect described above states that the very<br />
act of observing something (or someone) changes the object<br />
of our observation, an effect not lost on Internet founder<br />
Sir Tim Berners-Lee in recent comments on BT&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;We use the internet without a thought that a third party<br />
would know what we have just clicked on. Yet the URLs<br />
[webpages] people use reveal a huge amount about their<br />
lives, loves, hates and fears. This is extremely sensitive<br />
information. </p>
<p>&#8220;People use the web in a crisis, when wondering whether<br />
they have a sexually transmitted disease, or cancer, when<br />
wondering if they are homosexual and whether to talk about<br />
it&#8230; to discuss political views.&#8221; </p>
<p>According to Berners-Lee, we &#8220;use the internet to inform<br />
ourselves as voters in a democracy&#8230; we use the internet<br />
to decide what is true and what is not.</p>
<p>&#8220;We use the internet for healthcare and social interaction.</p>
<p>&#8220;There will be a huge commercial pressure to release this<br />
data,&#8221; he said. &#8220;The principle should be that it is not to<br />
be collected in the first place.&#8221;</p>
<p>The implications are clear: Consumers will change their<br />
behavior if they suspect that sensitive data will be<br />
shared with third-party interests.</p>
<p>Nothing about BT makes it immune to the otherwise immutable<br />
laws of physics. Instead, we should recognize it for what<br />
it is: pure, unadulterated, high-tech snake oil &#8212; an<br />
arrogant subset of the same convoluted logic that suggests<br />
that who you talk to is somehow more important than what<br />
you have to say. </p>
<p>All of the above notwithstanding, the potential for abuse<br />
inherent in BT is staggering, and far outweighs any<br />
presumed benefits. And speaking of benefits, where exactly<br />
is the BT upside, a 17% lift on an already subatomic .2%<br />
clickthrough? Advertisers, get serious: BT does nothing<br />
for you except insult your customers, drain your budget,<br />
and potentially injure your brand in the process. Much<br />
better instead to pause and reconsider our obsessions with<br />
targeting technologies &#8212; all of which have done nothing<br />
in aggregate but conspire to drive down performance and<br />
drive up costs. </p>
<p>Much better instead to reinvest your time and money in<br />
the fundamentals of a good message and better online<br />
destination experiences. Challenge your agency to explore<br />
and learn how &#8212; in an on-demand media universe &#8212; to let<br />
your audience target you. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with select rapid-growth clients to help<br />
define and execute healthy brand strategies in a toxic<br />
media environment.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/07/22/targeting-bad-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s This Whole World Coming To?</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/07/01/whats-this-whole-world-coming-to-2/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/07/01/whats-this-whole-world-coming-to-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoky Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's This Whole World Coming To?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s This Whole World Coming To?
By Jeff Einstein
&#8220;What&#8217;s this whole world coming to?
Things just ain&#8217;t the same,
any time the hunter gets captured by the game.&#8221;
– Smoky Robinson 
Back in 1994, I devoted one of my weekly MediaDailyNews
columns to the unsuccessful search for an antonym for the
word predatory &#8212; used by a friend to describe the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s This Whole World Coming To?<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s this whole world coming to?<br />
Things just ain&#8217;t the same,<br />
any time the hunter gets captured by the game.&#8221;<br />
– Smoky Robinson </p>
<p>Back in 1994, I devoted one of my weekly MediaDailyNews<br />
columns to the unsuccessful search for an antonym for the<br />
word predatory &#8212; used by a friend to describe the entire<br />
digital marketing industry. Now, half a decade later and<br />
no closer to success, it&#8217;s time to revisit the whole<br />
marketer-as-predator theme&#8230; </p>
<p>Predators are hunters; they target, stalk and attack –<br />
just like digital media professionals. Evidence of our<br />
carnivorous behavior is found everywhere we look. Even<br />
the most casual survey reveals that the vast majority of<br />
digital marketing trade articles introduce, explore and<br />
debate technologies designed to target and deliver market-<br />
ing messages &#8212; this, despite the fact that our intended<br />
prey seems more than ever determined to avoid them at all<br />
costs. More disturbing still is the reverse technology-to-<br />
performance ratio that accompanies this massive cat and<br />
mouse game; the more time and money we invest in targeting<br />
technologies, the more performance declines. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8220;This is a love story. A true love story&#8221; &#8211; Barbara Walters<br />
Christian The Lion DVD &#8211; The Full Story of Christian</p>
<p>List Price: $49.99<br />
Our Price: $19.99</p>
<p>Here is the beautiful, all true story, about Christian the<br />
Lion. After years of being raised around humans, Christian<br />
considers himself a human too. Follow his story as he is<br />
introduced to the wild African plains for the first time<br />
in his life. And then the whole, full story of the reunion<br />
of Christian with the folks who raised them&#8230;. You won&#8217;t<br />
believe how your heart will melt! </p>
<p>       &#8220;More than 40 million people have viewed this<br />
        very special love story&#8221; &#8211; Oprah</p>
<p>        &#8220;It&#8217;s something to see&#8221;- Joy Behar, The View</p>
<p>        &#8220;It&#8217;s so uplifting&#8230; I Wept Like A Baby&#8221;<br />
         &#8211; Meredith Viera, Today Show</p>
<p>SPECIAL BONUS: You Get two bonus movies free:<br />
- The Great Dan Patch    &#8211; Cute &#038; Cuddly Critters</p>
<p>That&#8217;s three movies on two DVDs for $19.99&#8230; a $30 savings.<br />
To see a video clip from the DVD or order, visit:<br />
VISIT: <a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/u/14511/c/120/a/618">Christian The Lion DVD &#8211; The Full Story of Christian</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The jury is in, folks, and the verdict against the digital<br />
marketing industry is guilty by reason of insanity<br />
(defined as doing the same thing over and over and expect-<br />
ing different results). Our industry labors under a self-<br />
imposed mass psychosis that somehow convinces us that<br />
stupidity is okay as long as everyone is stupid. Don&#8217;t<br />
get me wrong: I&#8217;m a big believer in ignorance as a key<br />
component of innovation and faith, but stupidity is a<br />
whole different creature. In an on-demand world where<br />
advertising seems to be the only thing no one demands, the<br />
whole concept of targeting an audience that resists every<br />
effort to do so seems not only archaic and non-sequitur,<br />
but downright stupid and self-defeating. </p>
<p>We are so immersed in and enthralled with our own<br />
technologies and corresponding mythologies that we fail<br />
to see what&#8217;s been in plain sight all along: In an on-<br />
demand world it makes far more sense to let the audience<br />
target us. To do so, however, requires a tectonic shift<br />
in our own thinking and a willingness to put our obsessions<br />
with all things digital on hold just long enough (on<br />
occasion) to entertain the rarest of jewels in a world gone<br />
mad: common sense. </p>
<p>Common sense dictates that we learn to distinguish between<br />
hunting and fishing. As mentioned above, hunters target,<br />
stalk and attack. By contrast&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;Any fish bites if you got good bait.<br />
Here&#8217;s a little something I would like to relate&#8230;&#8221;<br />
– Doc Watson</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Karada Cleansing/Detox Foot Pads </p>
<p>Retail Price: $19.99<br />
DEAL PRICE: $9.99 (for package of 10)</p>
<p>Over 18 million foot patches are sold every month in Asia,<br />
see what they can do for you. Japanese Detox Foot Patches<br />
are all the rage and now you can get them without paying<br />
an outrageous price&#8230; get them for 1/2 price while you<br />
can. </p>
<p>The Karada Cleansing Foot Pads are made from bamboo<br />
vinegar, an ingredient Japanese scientists have proven<br />
has the ability to draw out toxins from the body. </p>
<p>These foot patches are said to stimulate nerve endings<br />
on the bottom of your feet which in turn stimulate the<br />
secretion of lymph fluid. Using the Karada Foot Pads you<br />
have the ability to pull out the impurities in your body<br />
by focusing on the acupressure points in your feet. Best<br />
of all, they are so easy to use.</p>
<p>Features:<br />
- Helps cleanse your body by drawing-out chemicals &#038; toxins.<br />
- Includes 10 Patches<br />
- 100% All-Natural formula made with real wood &#038; bamboo<br />
  vinegar.<br />
- Easy-to-use individual wrapped packs</p>
<p>Get a 10-Pk for the low price. Save even more and get two<br />
packages (20 pads in total) for $15.98.<br />
Visit: <a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/r/120/a/618/l/lw1bb4">Karada Cleansing/Detox Foot Pads </a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Common sense is what the Yaqui shaman Don Juan exhibits<br />
in Carlos Castaneda&#8217;s The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui<br />
Way of Knowledge when he sets out to hunt a rabbit. Like<br />
today&#8217;s fathomless media landscape, Don Juan&#8217;s native<br />
desert habitat is far too vast to cover and his prey too<br />
wily to stalk and hunt efficiently. So he doesn&#8217;t stalk<br />
and he doesn&#8217;t hunt at all. Instead, he sets a trap and<br />
invites the rabbit to make a choice: enter or don&#8217;t.<br />
Thus he fulfils his own needs by honoring and respecting<br />
the free will of his perspective dinner. Likewise,<br />
wouldn&#8217;t advertisers be better served in an on-demand<br />
world by a model that invites us to participate rather<br />
than by one that hunts us down like animals? Wouldn&#8217;t<br />
advertisers be better served in an on-demand universe by<br />
a model that transforms them from hunters into the hunted? </p>
<p>Advertising is an art, not a science, no matter what the<br />
MBA-driven technocrats say. And in the art of persuasion,<br />
good bait trumps good ammo every time. On-demand media<br />
demand good bait, but we respond instead with more<br />
sophisticated ammo and launch the equivalent of laser-<br />
targeted carpet-bombing campaigns that not only further<br />
alienate our prospects, but convert the media landscape<br />
into a scorched wasteland in the process. </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you know it? Just when we need it most, common<br />
sense goes fishing&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>About Jeff Einstein and the Brothers Einstein</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with select rapid-growth clients to help<br />
define and execute healthy brand strategies in a toxic<br />
media environment. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/07/01/whats-this-whole-world-coming-to-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gimme a Break: Part 2 of 2</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/05/27/gimme-a-break-part-2-of-2/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/05/27/gimme-a-break-part-2-of-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gimme a Break: Part 2 of 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Goodwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lily Tomlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney J. Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gimme a Break: Part 2 of 2
By Jeff Einstein
Half our life is spent trying to find something to do with
the time we have rushed through life trying to save.
&#8211; Will Rogers 
In Part 1 of Gimme a Break, I suggested that the reason why
advertising doesn&#8217;t work very well anymore is because we&#8217;ve
essentially eliminated the commercial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gimme a Break: Part 2 of 2<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>Half our life is spent trying to find something to do with<br />
the time we have rushed through life trying to save.<br />
&#8211; Will Rogers </p>
<p>In Part 1 of Gimme a Break, I suggested that the reason why<br />
advertising doesn&#8217;t work very well anymore is because we&#8217;ve<br />
essentially eliminated the commercial break from our lives<br />
– especially during the commercial break, which nowadays<br />
more closely resembles a digital feeding frenzy, and hence<br />
destroys the very ad model it&#8217;s designed to serve. In fact,<br />
our entire on-demand lives have devolved into extended<br />
digital feeding frenzies, with no time for reflection, no<br />
tolerance whatsoever for intrusion, and no breaks from the<br />
media action. </p>
<p>What bothers me most about the current state of advertising<br />
and marketing, however, is how utterly predatory and<br />
atavistic we&#8217;ve become since the mid-1990s, when twenty-<br />
something digital evangelists decided that advertisers<br />
and marketers should a) engage in brand dialogues with<br />
consumers (mostly because there was suddenly a shitload of<br />
new digital technology to foist on them), and b) conduct<br />
said brand dialogues in a thoroughly mediated and seamless<br />
digital world, which of course renders impossible the<br />
requisite intrusion and time to establish and maintain any<br />
meaningful dialogue – brand or otherwise – with anyone.<br />
Baffled and besieged, older, more sober generations of<br />
advertisers and marketers deferred immediately and stepped<br />
aside, mostly because they couldn&#8217;t reboot their own<br />
computers without the help of the twenty-somethings. The<br />
days of the commercial break were clearly numbered. </p>
<p>Of course the predatory attribute I assigned above should<br />
not be confused with anything or anyone forward-thinking<br />
or proactive, and is wholly reactive instead (hence its<br />
atavistic nature), far more akin to the desperate pride of<br />
lions that haunts a watering hole during a deadly drought<br />
than the same willful pride that hunts at night when water<br />
and game are plentiful. Thus today&#8217;s generation of<br />
advertisers and marketers, all clustered like starving<br />
lions around the same watering hole, truly believe that<br />
they owe their jobs to consumer opinion, and are therefore<br />
compelled to react like lemmings as quickly as possible<br />
to perceived consumer demand – with every digital<br />
technology in their arsenal. By contrast, their displaced<br />
predecessors knew otherwise: that there is no such thing<br />
as consumer demand except to the extent that marketers<br />
and advertisers create it. The good ones knew something<br />
else also: that job one in creating consumer demand was<br />
to create and protect the integrity of the commercial<br />
break, what Bill Bernbach called the environment to buy. </p>
<p>But how can we possibly expect others to take a break long<br />
enough to engage our brand messages if we can&#8217;t take one<br />
for ourselves? Remember, we as marketers and advertisers<br />
create and shape consumer demand. And if we can&#8217;t control<br />
how we spend our own time, how can we as marketers and<br />
advertisers possibly hope to influence how others spend<br />
theirs? </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
CAMPER&#8217;S SURVIVAL TOOL<br />
Not Just For Camping&#8230;</p>
<p>List Price: $19.99<br />
DEAL PRICE: $8.00<br />
Get two for $14.00</p>
<p>While this is the perfect camper&#8217;s companion, we think<br />
EVERY car should have one too! This handy tool has a<br />
flashlight&#8230; but not just any ordinary flashlight. Not<br />
only is it SUPER BRIGHT, it turns into a blinking distress<br />
light with one additional click. </p>
<p>Tucked away in the hidden compartment are two stainless<br />
steel utensils (Spoon &#038; Fork) that are magnetized to<br />
prevent excess jostling inside the container. Ventilation<br />
holes allow moisture to escape after utensils are washed. </p>
<p>Just when you think that there&#8217;s nothing else.. how about<br />
a multi-use tool that has a can opener, corkscrew, knife<br />
and bottle opener.</p>
<p>Lightweight and durable, this multi-function tool will<br />
fit inside a backpack, glove compartment, golf bag and<br />
more. </p>
<p>And YES&#8230; Batteries ARE INCLUDED! Get one for $8.00 or<br />
two for $14.00. They really do make a wonderful gift.<br />
<a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/u/14500/c/120/a/618">CAMPER&#8217;S SURVIVAL TOOL &#8211; Not Just For Camping&#8230;</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The following is an excerpt from a recent post I made to<br />
the Oldtimers Foundation listserv: </p>
<p>To the question of how we can affect change in the midst<br />
of our day jobs and selfish best interests, I would reply,<br />
&#8220;First, slow down.&#8221; Our agendas are already far too full<br />
and far too hectic to engage in or otherwise entertain<br />
meaningful thought and discourse. We&#8217;ve turned time &#8212; our<br />
only real inventory &#8212; into an enemy. We cannot begin to<br />
accommodate new thoughts and behaviors unless and until<br />
we find a way to intervene in our own lives long and<br />
frequently enough to prepare the soil of our souls for new<br />
seeds. We cannot affect meaningful change in ourselves or<br />
others unless and until we reclaim our time. </p>
<p>Of course the reclamation of our time is easier said than<br />
done, but &#8212; in all earnestness &#8212; I would suggest the<br />
following remedial steps: </p>
<p>1. Change your career objective right now. Aspire instead<br />
to take a nap, go for a walk, read a good novel or other-<br />
wise tune out completely for at least an hour during the<br />
course of each work day. No digital devices or electronic<br />
media allowed (with the sole exception of music). We spend<br />
our entire work lives striving for the moment when we can<br />
retire, put our feet up, and take a nap. My suggestion<br />
therefore is to eliminate the career middle man and head<br />
straight for the nap. You (and just about everyone else<br />
you know) will thank me later. It ain&#8217;t about money at<br />
the end of the day; it&#8217;s about time, and how and where<br />
and with whom we spend it. The rest of your work day will<br />
fall magically into place once you aspire &#8212; first and<br />
foremost &#8212; to take a nap as your new career objective. </p>
<p>2. Be conscious of your tools. Move your personal and<br />
professional communications up the emotional impact ladder<br />
at every opportunity. In other words, consciously choose<br />
communications tools that require more deliberation and<br />
deliver more heart and soul &#8212; like a phone call or a well-<br />
crafted letter or a face-to-face meeting over an email,<br />
text message or tweet &#8212; whenever possible. Always choose<br />
quality over quantity (because it&#8217;s always your choice),<br />
and always choose deliberateness over speed; don&#8217;t<br />
communicate on the run except in emergencies. Remember:<br />
speed kills. </p>
<p>3. Resist the narcotic impulse to check your email inbox<br />
for the first hour of every day. Each time you sit down<br />
first thing in the morning to check your email inbox, you<br />
automatically put your own agenda dead last behind the<br />
collective agendas of all the emails you find there. In<br />
doing so you invite a purely reactive mindset that forces<br />
you to play catchup for the balance of your day (and life). </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Handy Trends Upside Down Tomato Planter<br />
World&#8217;s Easiest Way To Grow Vegetables&#8230;</p>
<p>Normal Price: $19.99<br />
DEAL PRICE: $12.99<br />
Get two for $19.98 </p>
<p>I have wanted this item for almost two months. And judging<br />
by the email I&#8217;ve gotten from many of you&#8230; you have been<br />
waiting too.</p>
<p>Well wait no more&#8230; The Upside Down Tomato Planter is here.<br />
One thing I did not know is that you can use this for other<br />
vegetables besides Tomatoes.</p>
<p>The Handy Trends Upside Down Tomato Planter is an ingenious<br />
tomato/vegetable planter turns gardening upside down! Grow<br />
delicious, juicy tomatoes all season long simply by hanging<br />
it on a deck, balcony or patio. </p>
<p>Simply plant seeds or a plant in the wire basket, hang,<br />
water, and watch it grow&#8230; yep it is that easy.</p>
<p>This efficient growing system yields up to 30 lbs of<br />
tomatoes per plant. As we said&#8230; The Tomato Planter can<br />
grow more than just tomatoes&#8230; try cucumbers, eggplants,<br />
herbs and more. You&#8217;ll love how easy it is to have a garden<br />
on your patio. </p>
<p>To get more info or order, visit:<br />
<a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/u/14505/c/120/a/618">Handy Trends Upside Down Tomato Planter</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Each of the above suggestions requires time and conscious<br />
deliberation. But that&#8217;s the point. We can choose to<br />
intervene in our own lives and industry or someone or<br />
something else will intervene for us &#8212; guaranteed. </p>
<p>Advertisers, take a nap, and when you wake up encourage<br />
your agency contacts to take a nap also. Mandate a no-<br />
email period each morning. Get them out of the fire-<br />
fighting business and into the fire-starting business.<br />
Their performance will improve and so will yours. </p>
<p>Agencies, create a digital media-free area where your<br />
employees can sit down and talk quietly, read a book, or<br />
just stretch out and take a nap. Their performance will<br />
improve and so will yours. </p>
<p>Time is of the essence, but only when we honor it, only<br />
when we befriend it. Consider therefore the words of Jim<br />
Goodwin and Sydney J. Harris:<br />
&#8220;The time to relax is when you don&#8217;t have time for it.&#8221;</p>
<p>And entertain right now the sage advice of Lily Tomlin:<br />
&#8220;For fast-acting relief, try slowing down.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>About Jeff Einstein and the Brothers Einstein</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with select rapid-growth clients to help<br />
define and execute healthy brand strategies in a toxic<br />
media environment. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/05/27/gimme-a-break-part-2-of-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gimme a Break: Part 1 of 2</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/05/06/gimme-a-break-part-1-of-2/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/05/06/gimme-a-break-part-1-of-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gimme a Break: Part 1 of 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media-induced ADD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wide Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gimme a Break: Part 1 of 2
By Jeff Einstein
A generation or so ago, before the introduction of the
World Wide Web, and before broadcast television became the
alternative to cable, TV viewers actually took a break
during the commercial break. That&#8217;s when we went to the
can, fixed a snack, chatted with friends or family, and
otherwise engaged in more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gimme a Break: Part 1 of 2<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>A generation or so ago, before the introduction of the<br />
World Wide Web, and before broadcast television became the<br />
alternative to cable, TV viewers actually took a break<br />
during the commercial break. That&#8217;s when we went to the<br />
can, fixed a snack, chatted with friends or family, and<br />
otherwise engaged in more recognizably break-like, flesh-<br />
and-bone behaviors. </p>
<p>Fade out, fade in: There is no more commercial break, at<br />
least not in the sense that anyone older than thirty might<br />
remember or recognize from days past. Today&#8217;s commercial<br />
break is instead an exercise in media-induced ADD, a<br />
programmed license to pick up the nearest digital device(s)<br />
and go virtually nuts – text an old friend, make a new<br />
friend, make a dozen new friends, make a hundred new<br />
friends, tweet, tweet again, tweet once more, fast-forward,<br />
channel surf, download a tune, upload a video&#8230; ad<br />
nauseam. In short, there is no commercial break, no break,<br />
in fact, of any kind. There&#8217;s only the stress that comes<br />
from living life immersed in a break-free media environ-<br />
ment, and stress – according to psychotherapist and author<br />
Richard Carlson – is nothing more than a socially accept-<br />
able form of mental illness. </p>
<p>We functionally eliminate the commercial break from our<br />
lives when we populate each and every moment of them with<br />
dozens of digitally-driven media alternatives to whatever<br />
media we happen to be consuming at the time. In fact, the<br />
very page on which this article appears will likely offer<br />
no fewer than forty links to other pages, each vying to<br />
compete for your already beaten and battered attention.<br />
Multiply this single moment in time by the fact that the<br />
average American now consumes almost twelve hours of media<br />
each and every day. Not only do we now spend our entire<br />
waking lives immersed in media, but we do so under relent-<br />
less pressure to be somewhere we&#8217;re not (anywhere, to be<br />
precise) each and every minute. The ensuing stress is<br />
interpreted by Zen writer Natalie Goldberg as a state of<br />
ignorance, a destination of sorts for those who no longer<br />
understand that ignorance is a far better place in which<br />
to begin our journey than to end it. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
American Builder 26 Piece Folding Tool Tote<br />
Tools You&#8217;ll Use, Not Lose&#8230;</p>
<p>List Price: $14.99<br />
DEAL PRICE: $7.99</p>
<p>Finally, tools you&#8217;ll use and not lose.  This 26-piece Fold-<br />
ing Tool Tote from American Builder organizes your tools<br />
like never before.  </p>
<p>Designed and built to last from the strongest alloys<br />
available, these 26 quality tools fit neatly inside a<br />
durable nylon case that when folded-up fits just about<br />
anywhere&#8230; your tool box, your car&#8217;s glove box, even<br />
your &#8220;everything&#8221; drawer. </p>
<p>Each Folding Tool Tote includes:<br />
- 6-pc Precision Screwdrivers<br />
- Tweezers<br />
- 4.5&#8243; Diagonal Pliers/Wire Cutter<br />
- 5&#8243; Long Nose Pliers<br />
- Interchangeable Drive Handle<br />
- Socket Driver Adapter Bit<br />
- 10-pc Driver Bit Set<br />
- 4-pc Socket Set<br />
- Convenient Storage Case<br />
- Bit Holster </p>
<p>Remember you get All 26 pieces for about what you&#8217;d expect<br />
to pay for any single one of these tools bought separately.</p>
<p>Compare to similar products costing much more&#8230; then<br />
head on over to PulseTV site to order by visiting:<br />
<a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/u/3806/c/120/a/618">American Builder 26 Piece Folding Tool Tote</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Of course, all of these competing interests per moment of<br />
media consumption exact a toll on all of us (not least on<br />
advertisers and marketers), and drive down performance,<br />
especially when we consider that all this digitally-induced<br />
neurosis is delivered in a seamless user interface designed<br />
explicitly to eliminate any potential intrusion and get us<br />
where we&#8217;re going (wherever that is) in record time. This<br />
is problematic only because advertising relies almost<br />
exclusively on its ability to intrude upon and otherwise<br />
interrupt our lives. </p>
<p>Some years ago I introduced a term to describe the percent-<br />
age of each media dollar that ultimately goes towards over-<br />
coming the inertia (the sum total of those things that<br />
inhibit advertising engagement) generated by each medium.<br />
I called it the Inertia Tax, and today it consumes more<br />
than 99 cents of every digital media ad dollar spent &#8212; a<br />
fact that digital media acolytes would rather ignore than<br />
confront. Apparently, it&#8217;s still easier to sell a .3% CTR<br />
than explain a 99.7% failure rate. </p>
<p>Along similar lines, digital old timer and seasoned ad pro<br />
Larry Smith recently introduced SOX, a new term to describe<br />
an advertiser&#8217;s Share Of eXit links on any given digital<br />
page. The more exit links per page, the lower the<br />
advertiser&#8217;s SOX, and the more likely they are at the end<br />
of the day to be eaten alive by the Inertia Tax. I wish<br />
Larry more traction with SOX than I engendered with the<br />
Inertia Tax. </p>
<p>Is it any wonder, therefore, that ads don&#8217;t work? Who&#8217;s got<br />
the time for them and who among us will still tolerate the<br />
intrusion? There&#8217;s simply no break in the media action any-<br />
where anymore, no breathing room, not even the remotest<br />
possibility for intrusion, commercial or otherwise. There&#8217;s<br />
no time for meaningful relationships to incubate and<br />
emerge. Each additional layer of compensatory targeting<br />
technology drives performance down a notch as marketers<br />
become increasingly predatory in an escalating pattern of<br />
digital aggression &#8212; behavior that does not go unnoticed<br />
by our elusive prey. Behavioral targeting and other hyper-<br />
aggressive digital technologies can only further wreck the<br />
media ecology as they change the very behavior they seek to<br />
track and exploit &#8212; the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle<br />
amplified by a billion microchips. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
APPLE CIDER VINEGAR PILLS</p>
<p>Normal Price: $9.99<br />
DEAL PRICE: $2.99 per bottle</p>
<p>The #1 ALL NATURAL Diet Product For The Last 50 Years<br />
WILL Help YOU Lose Weight&#8230;.</p>
<p>The best-selling and most proven All Natural diet aid<br />
available. For the last 50 years hundreds of thousands<br />
of people have successfully lost weight with Apple Cider<br />
Vinegar&#8230;.</p>
<p>Now you can get this Amazing supplement in an easy and<br />
convenient tablet form. No more bad tasting liquids. And<br />
it&#8217;s even more concentrated in the tablet form. Plus, it<br />
is guaranteed to work for you. If you don&#8217;t lose the<br />
weight you want with Amazing Apple Cider Vinegar just<br />
return it for a refund. It&#8217;s JUST $2.99 for 60 Tablets.<br />
Visit: <a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/r/120/a/618/l/ti4p52">APPLE CIDER VINEGAR PILLS</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>We tell our audiences that we only want to engage them, but<br />
they know better by now; they know that we want them to<br />
capitulate, to surrender, to raise the white flag in utter<br />
defeat. We want their heads &#8212; like big game trophies &#8212;<br />
on our office walls, and that&#8217;s why we hunt them down like<br />
animals. So in self defense they offer up only virtual<br />
shadows of themselves for us to target, then they scatter<br />
those shadows everywhere all the time to confuse and<br />
confound us to wit&#8217;s end. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve simply worn out our welcome. In an on-demand media<br />
universe, marketing and advertising can survive by<br />
invitation only. It&#8217;s time to change our vocabulary from<br />
&#8220;Can I?&#8221; to &#8220;May I?&#8221; It&#8217;s time to take a break. Next<br />
week, fellow marketers, I&#8217;ll explain how, because it all<br />
begins with you, and the virtual switch between your ears.<br />
Until then, remember the sage words of author Hartman<br />
Jule&#8230; </p>
<p>Sometimes a headache is all in your head. Relax. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with select rapid-growth clients to help<br />
define and execute healthy brand strategies in a toxic<br />
media environment. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/05/06/gimme-a-break-part-1-of-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Intersection of Faith and Fear</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/04/15/the-intersection-of-faith-and-fear/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/04/15/the-intersection-of-faith-and-fear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commiseration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketers: Meet Me at the Intersection of Faith and Fear...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meet Me at the Intersection of Faith and Fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nelson Mandela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Intersection of Faith and Fear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marketers: Meet Me at the Intersection of Faith and Fear&#8230;
By Jeff Einstein
Our greatest fear is not that we are inadequate,
but that we are powerful beyond measure.
It is our light, not our darkness, that frightens us.
We ask ourselves, Who am I to be brilliant,
gorgeous, handsome, talented and fabulous?
Actually, who are you not to be?
You are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketers: Meet Me at the Intersection of Faith and Fear&#8230;<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>Our greatest fear is not that we are inadequate,<br />
but that we are powerful beyond measure.</p>
<p>It is our light, not our darkness, that frightens us.<br />
We ask ourselves, Who am I to be brilliant,<br />
gorgeous, handsome, talented and fabulous?</p>
<p>Actually, who are you not to be?<br />
You are a child of God.</p>
<p>Your playing small does not serve the world.<br />
There is nothing enlightened about shrinking<br />
so that other people won&#8217;t feel insecure around you.</p>
<p>We were born to make manifest the glory of God within us.<br />
It is not just in some; it is in everyone.</p>
<p>And, as we let our own light shine, we consciously give<br />
other people permission to do the same.<br />
As we are liberated from our fear,<br />
our presence automatically liberates others.<br />
&#8211; Nelson Mandela</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
DUAL-POWER DESKTOP FAN w/ Intelligent Speed Control<br />
Superior Airflow Compared To Fans Twice The Size&#8230;</p>
<p>Sharper Image Price: $19.99<br />
YOUR PRICE: $9.99</p>
<p>Cool off anywhere with this adjustable dual-power fan.<br />
The compact design fits on a desk or tabletop. You&#8217;ll<br />
love the that you can run it with DC adapter (included)<br />
or 4 &#8220;C&#8221; batteries (not included). </p>
<p>Intelligent Speed Control incrementally adjust speed up<br />
or down with the touch of a button! Choose from a light<br />
breeze of full-power with ease.</p>
<p>Powerful high RPM motor runs quietly while providing<br />
superior airflow of fans twice the size. But don&#8217;t worry&#8230;<br />
it has finger safe blades. Measures: 5&#8243; x 7&#8243; x 4.5&#8243;.</p>
<p>FEATURES:<br />
- Intelligent Speed Control<br />
- On/off button resumes air at the most recent speed<br />
  selected<br />
- Can run on a DC adaptor (INCLUDED)<br />
- Can run on 4 &#8216;C&#8217; batteries (Not Included)<br />
- Adjustable head directs air where you need it </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let this blow by you&#8230; grab one for 1/2 the normal<br />
price while you can. To see a picture or order, visit:<br />
<a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/u/14463/c/120/a/618">DUAL-POWER DESKTOP FAN w/ Intelligent Speed Control</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The search for meaning, commiseration, and escape clearly<br />
finds motivation in fear and uncertainty, and it&#8217;s not<br />
for nothing that deep recessions typically witness sharp<br />
increases in church attendance, bar traffic, and box office<br />
sales. These are deeply evocative days. Why then are we<br />
marketers and advertisers of the digital era so fearful<br />
of our own power to evoke? Why do we shrink from substance<br />
and seek refuge in trivia? </p>
<p>Offered in honor of Easter is a passage in the Gospel of<br />
Mark in which Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James,<br />
and Salome go to Christ&#8217;s tomb to anoint him, a simple act<br />
of respect imbued nonetheless with considerable risk under<br />
Roman rule. They find the large rock that had sealed the<br />
tomb the previous day mysteriously rolled aside, and inside<br />
sits a young man clothed in a white robe, but no Jesus. The<br />
young man tells them that the crucified Jesus of Nazareth<br />
has risen, then instructs them to tell the disciples and<br />
Peter that Jesus had gone ahead to Galilee, where they will<br />
meet again, as promised. </p>
<p>The three women had confronted their fears that morning<br />
when they went to the tomb of Jesus, expecting to pay their<br />
homage, complete their task, and move on with their lives,<br />
the terrifying crucifixion of Jesus now behind them.<br />
Apparently, however, no good deed goes unpunished, and<br />
they are instructed instead to confront their fears once<br />
again, this time as disciples in Galilee. What they thought<br />
was the end turned out in fact to be just the beginning.<br />
The antidote to their fear proved to be their faith – over<br />
and over and over again. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Micro Light LED Keychains w/ Retractable Pen (3 pack)<br />
Available At 1/2 Price&#8230;</p>
<p>List Price: $9.99<br />
DEAL PRICE: $4.99<br />
Get Two for $7.98</p>
<p>No more fumbling about in the dark! The Powerbeam Micro<br />
Lights project a powerful high-intensity beam of L.E.D.<br />
light so you can see and be seen in the dark. </p>
<p>Its unique and sturdy design, works with 2 lithium CR2016<br />
batteries (INCLUDED!), and provides a long-lasting use. </p>
<p>There are so many things I love about this., like:<br />
- It&#8217;s small so it&#8217;s not a burden to have on my keys<br />
- The switch is big and easy to turn on with my thumb<br />
- The light is very powerful<br />
- The pen is just the coolest idea and can come in handy</p>
<p>The Powerbeam Micro Lights gift pack includes a set of 3<br />
keychains: red, green and blue. Plus as a BONUS, each key-<br />
chain has a hidden retractable pen. </p>
<p>Get one 3-pack (3 Micro Lights) for $4.99 or two 3-Packs<br />
(6 Micro Lights) for $7.98.<br />
VISIT: <a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/u/14470/c/120/a/618">Micro Light LED Keychains w/ Retractable Pen (3 pack)</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>What they and other heroes learned over the eons is what<br />
successful marketers have known for decades: that the<br />
true key to success in marketing and advertising is found<br />
precisely in the confluence of fear and faith. The best<br />
among us search out those fearsome intersections and<br />
confront them with deliberate faith. The best among us<br />
will gladly trade true uncertainty for false security any<br />
day. </p>
<p>But as digital marketers we&#8217;ve lost faith in ourselves and<br />
now share our loss with others via technology-mediated,<br />
emotionally and spiritually destitute encounters measured<br />
in the tens of millions and billions. We are playing<br />
impossibly small when we define success as a 17% lift on<br />
a .3%, CTR, and we are compelled in the process to redefine<br />
powerful words like &#8220;relationship&#8221; and &#8220;friend&#8221; downward to<br />
meet our own impoverished expectations. We systematically<br />
strip all meaning and substance from our own language –<br />
just so others won&#8217;t feel insecure around us. In the end<br />
the medium becomes the sole message, a lonely and soulfully<br />
empty place whose only call to action is more of the same. </p>
<p>Marketing and advertising should liberate and inspire<br />
others to act. Online marketing and advertising does<br />
neither for a simple reason: we cannot liberate and<br />
inspire others to act unless and until we first liberate<br />
and inspire ourselves. But we choose instead to remain<br />
mired in fear. We choose to remain small for fear of our<br />
own power. </p>
<p>Recessions should be and typically are opportunities to<br />
reaffirm our faith, opportunities to rediscover meaning<br />
and recover substance in our lives. Don&#8217;t let this one<br />
pass you by simply because your email inbox is full or<br />
because you&#8217;re too busy with social network pissing games.<br />
Play big instead. Look for me at the intersection of faith<br />
and fear, and together we&#8217;ll forge a better future for<br />
ourselves, our families, and our industry. Phone me at<br />
347-561-4465 and we&#8217;ll get started today. I&#8217;ll meet you<br />
in Galilee&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>About Jeff Einstein and the Brothers Einstein</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with select rapid-growth clients to help<br />
define and execute healthy brand strategies in a toxic<br />
media environment. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/04/15/the-intersection-of-faith-and-fear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s This Whole World Coming To?</title>
		<link>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/03/25/whats-this-whole-world-coming-to/</link>
		<comments>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/03/25/whats-this-whole-world-coming-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doc Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoky Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's This Whole World Coming To?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotes.gophercentral.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s This Whole World Coming To?
By Jeff Einstein
&#8220;What&#8217;s this whole world coming to?
Things just ain&#8217;t the same,
any time the hunter gets captured by the game.&#8221;
– Smoky Robinson 
Back in 1994, I devoted one of my weekly MediaDailyNews
columns to the unsuccessful search for an antonym for the
word predatory &#8212; used by a friend to describe the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s This Whole World Coming To?<br />
By Jeff Einstein</p>
<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s this whole world coming to?<br />
Things just ain&#8217;t the same,<br />
any time the hunter gets captured by the game.&#8221;<br />
– Smoky Robinson </p>
<p>Back in 1994, I devoted one of my weekly MediaDailyNews<br />
columns to the unsuccessful search for an antonym for the<br />
word predatory &#8212; used by a friend to describe the entire<br />
digital marketing industry. Now, half a decade later and<br />
no closer to success, it&#8217;s time to revisit the whole<br />
marketer-as-predator theme&#8230; </p>
<p>Predators are hunters; they target, stalk and attack –<br />
just like digital media professionals. Evidence of our<br />
carnivorous behavior is found everywhere we look. Even<br />
the most casual survey reveals that the vast majority of<br />
digital marketing trade articles introduce, explore and<br />
debate technologies designed to target and deliver market-<br />
ing messages &#8212; this, despite the fact that our intended<br />
prey seems more than ever determined to avoid them at all<br />
costs. More disturbing still is the reverse technology-to-<br />
performance ratio that accompanies this massive cat and<br />
mouse game; the more time and money we invest in targeting<br />
technologies, the more performance declines. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
STOR-POD PROTECTIVE STORAGE UNIT<br />
The In-Home Storage Solution&#8230;</p>
<p>List Price: $59.99<br />
YOUR PRICE: $29.99<br />
Get Two Part for $49.98</p>
<p>Most people under-utilized the storage space in their<br />
attics, basements, and self-storage units because of the<br />
risk of damage over the long-run. Tarps are flimsy, and<br />
plastic tubs don&#8217;t work for large or bulky items. What<br />
you need is a sturdy yet portable storage unit that will<br />
keep the dust, dirt, and insects out. </p>
<p>Made of reinforced polyethylene with heavy-duty hardware<br />
and zippers, these storage &#8220;pods&#8221; are a great way to<br />
maximize space while protecting against dust, moisture,<br />
insects, and other issues that make seasonal and long-<br />
term storage difficult. </p>
<p>The unique &#8220;ez grabber&#8221; strap system easily attaches to<br />
ceiling rafters, allowing the storage unit to both sit on<br />
the floor and stand upright. The straps also insure that<br />
the pod will stay securely in place as you move items in<br />
and out. </p>
<p>Great for basements, attics and self-storage units&#8230; and<br />
each pod is backed by a limited 5-year warranty against<br />
manufacturer defects.<br />
SIZE: 26 cubic ft. &#8212; 32&#8243;D x 36&#8243;W x 48&#8243;H<br />
VISIT: <a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/u/14398/c/120/a/618">Stor-Pod Protective Storage Unit</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The jury is in, folks, and the verdict against the digital<br />
marketing industry is guilty by reason of insanity (defined<br />
as doing the same thing over and over and expecting<br />
different results). Our industry labors under a self-<br />
imposed mass psychosis that somehow convinces us that<br />
stupidity is okay as long as everyone is stupid. Don&#8217;t<br />
get me wrong: I&#8217;m a big believer in ignorance as a key<br />
component of innovation and faith, but stupidity is a whole<br />
different creature. In an on-demand world where advertising<br />
seems to be the only thing no one demands, the whole<br />
concept of targeting an audience that resists every effort<br />
to do so seems not only archaic and non-sequitur, but<br />
downright stupid and self-defeating. </p>
<p>We are so immersed in and enthralled with our own<br />
technologies and corresponding mythologies that we fail to<br />
see what&#8217;s been in plain sight all along: In an on-demand<br />
world it makes far more sense to let the audience target<br />
us. To do so, however, requires a tectonic shift in our own<br />
thinking and a willingness to put our obsessions with all<br />
things digital on hold just long enough (on occasion) to<br />
entertain the rarest of jewels in a world gone mad: common<br />
sense. </p>
<p>Common sense dictates that we learn to distinguish between<br />
hunting and fishing. As mentioned above, hunters target,<br />
stalk and attack. By contrast&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;Any fish bites if you got good bait.<br />
Here&#8217;s a little something I would like to relate&#8230;&#8221;<br />
– Doc Watson </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
      *&#8212;&#8212;->  Keychain Laser Pointer <-------  </p>
<p>This handy laser pointer projects a beam of light over<br />
1000 feet and comes with 5 interchangeable image heads.<br />
This is perfect for teachers, students, tour guides, and<br />
for presentations. Dogs and cats love this laser pointer<br />
too, they will chase the laser beam around for hours.<br />
Get this handy laser pointer for $1.99... Order today by<br />
visiting: <a href="http://pd.gophercentral.com/r/120/a/618/l/w61eu4">Keychain Laser Pointer</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Common sense is what the Yaqui shaman Don Juan exhibits<br />
in Carlos Castaneda&#8217;s The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui<br />
Way of Knowledge when he sets out to hunt a rabbit. Like<br />
today&#8217;s fathomless media landscape, Don Juan&#8217;s native<br />
desert habitat is far too vast to cover and his prey too<br />
wily to stalk and hunt efficiently. So he doesn&#8217;t stalk<br />
and he doesn&#8217;t hunt at all. Instead, he sets a trap and<br />
invites the rabbit to make a choice: enter or don&#8217;t. Thus<br />
he fulfils his own needs by honoring and respecting the<br />
free will of his perspective dinner. Likewise, wouldn&#8217;t<br />
advertisers be better served in an on-demand world by a<br />
model that invites us to participate rather than by one<br />
that hunts us down like animals? Wouldn&#8217;t advertisers be<br />
better served in an on-demand universe by a model that<br />
transforms them from hunters into the hunted? </p>
<p>Advertising is an art, not a science, no matter what the<br />
MBA-driven technocrats say. And in the art of persuasion,<br />
good bait trumps good ammo every time. On-demand media<br />
demand good bait, but we respond instead with more<br />
sophisticated ammo and launch the equivalent of laser-<br />
targeted carpet-bombing campaigns that not only further<br />
alienate our prospects, but convert the media landscape<br />
into a scorched wasteland in the process. </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you know it? Just when we need it most, common<br />
sense goes fishing&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Jeff Einstein is one-half of the Brothers Einstein, a<br />
creative strategy and branding boutique. The Brothers<br />
Einstein work with select rapid-growth clients to help<br />
define and execute healthy brand strategies in a toxic<br />
media environment. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotes.gophercentral.com/2009/03/25/whats-this-whole-world-coming-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
